|
Dear Client,
By now I am sure we are all settled back into work
from what seemed to be a whirlwind summer. In
case
you were wondering, I did not send out a newsletter
this summer. Time had its way with me and it won
the war on my work activities. But I am back and. .
. . .
| The Big Story of the Summer! – Ken Lay’s Death Halts US Government Asset Seizure |
 |
|
Well in case you missed it, Ken Lay of Enron
fame,
passed away this summer. His cause of death was
attributed to a heart attack, one could say he
finally ran out of energy.
His untimely death
voided his guilty verdict and temporarily halted the
governments’ efforts to seize his remaining real
estate and financial assets.
His estate is
still
subject to civil lawsuits by the SEC and former
investors as well as Enron employees.
Enron collapsed in December, 2001, erasing a base of
$68 billion in market capital. It was the biggest
bankruptcy in U. S. history at the time.
A
direct
result of controversial accounting practices and a
display of corporate excess that abandoned all rules
of proper corporate conduct.
Within a year of Enron’s collapse, Congress passed
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, tightening accounting rules
in an effort to rein in renegade executives and
provide investors with more reliable information on
companies true financial conditions.
|
| 2006 is Still Tracking Well |
 |
|
As of the last week of September the market was
still showing strong performance despite bumps that
occurred over the summer. I would be happy if we
finished the year above 10%, which is historically
inline with traditional returns.
Oil prices have
dropped, retailers are expecting solid holiday sales
as a result of consumer spending (why they are still
spending is a mystery to me) and housing is flat but
inline with expectations.
As for the third quarter ending September 29, here
is where the indexes stand.
| |
wk
start |
wk end
|
chng. |
%
chng. |
YTD |
| DJIA |
11508.10 |
11679.07 |
170.97 |
1.5%
|
9.0%
|
| Nasdaq |
2218.93 |
2258.43 |
39.50 |
2.4%
|
2.4%
|
| S&P
500 |
1314.78 |
1335.85 |
21.07 |
7.0%
|
7.0%
|
| Russell
2000 |
718.63 |
72.59 |
6.96 |
7.8%
|
7.8%
|
This quarter both moderate and moderately aggressive
portfolios were inline with the Dow. The portfolios
came in at 7.1% and 10% respectively, after fees.
Please remember that no two portfolios are identical
and this information should be used as a barometer
for your own holdings.
|
| Annuities = High Costs = High Commissions = Lower Client Returns |
 |
|
It never fails, there isn’t a quarter that goes by,
when a client doesn’t ask me about annuities. The
answer is NO! No you do not need an annuity and it
certainly does not belong in your IRA. I will
once
again go over the "Fee Factor".
Variable
annuities
charge asset-based fund fees & and include 12b
fees, which can add 200 basis points (2%) in
costs.
Insurance charges – these cover the basis
death
benefit and expenses associated with the cost of
administering the account. This generally
represents 1.35%. Death benefit riders
–
these are
enhanced features that can be added to a policy
which equate to .40%. Living Benefit
Riders – and
so the list of extras goes on, with this rider you
can now expect to pay an additional .30 - .75% more
in hidden annuity costs. Surrender
Charges –
my all
time favorite. No one goes over this one with you.
There is a surrender charge attached to every
annuity. If you want to release yourself from the
annuity prior to the annuity lapsing, the charge can
be up to 7%, most annuities hold you hostage for up
to 7 years. The older policies have a caveat that
holds you there until 59 ½.
What do these fees mean to you? Simply stated they
erode the earning power of your investment year
after year. You, the client only see performance
after the fees are deducted.
So now let’s apply the "Fee Factor" to this example.
You have taken most of the riders and the annual
hidden fees amount to 4%.
The annuity
you bought
was for $100,000. You have now held it for four
years. Your annual performance has only been 3%,
well below market average. You have not seen or
heard from your insurance agent in some time and you
now want to move out off this investment into
something with greater potential for growth.
First, how much money have you lost? Assuming you
had instead invested in a fund that was held outside
of the annuity with an initial 1.5% charge, you
still would have had an additional 2.5% gain in year
one, and an additional 4% gain in years 2, 3, & 4.
The additional interest combined with the value of
compounding would give you $129,242 at the end of
the 4 year with a mutual fund. With a variable
annuity your return is $112,551 or a $16,691
reduction in investment return.
Now you
are ready
to cash out your annuity early. Your insurance
provider has told you that you have a 3% surrender
charge if you sell now. What does this mean – you
now owe them $3,376.53 or 3% of the current value
of
your annuity. So, you will be receiving a check for
$109,174.47, after 4 years with this wonderful
insurance product.
Your actual loss in
investment
dollars now rises to $20,067. Your actual return on
investment over the four year period is now 2.22%.
Now do you understand?
|
| Client Appreciation Event – Change of date! |
 |
|
In February, 2007, Coastal Financial Planning,
Inc.
will be celebrating 10 years in business. In light
of this milestone, we will be moving off our annual
client appreciation event into February, weather
permitting.
I will keep you all updated as the
details unfold and the arrangements for what I hope
to be the gala of the year begins!
|
| Royce Closes Another Fund |
 |
|
The Royce Fund Family has closed the Royce
Premier
Fund to new investors.
If you currently are
invested in this fund, you may continue to make
contributions. If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me.
|
| Important Changes at Coastal Financial Planning. Inc. |
 |
Over the next few weeks I will begin to
migrate
assets from FiServ (DataLynx) to Fidelity Advisor
Services
Many of you are already aware of this change. Some
of you have already started the migration process.
For those of you that I have not yet personally
spoke to, a letter will be going out this month
advising you specifically of the changes.
There are
several value-added services that Fidelity can offer
my clients that are not available through FiServ.
The most important is the rate of return on the
assets in the money market account.
As
you all
know, I frequently leave cash in money market
accounts until I feel the opportunity presents
itself to invest. Currently, Fidelity’s yield is
4.7%. This is a 7-day floating rate, and is
significantly higher than FiServ.
In the interim, if you have any questions, please
contact me at 401.727.8151. Thank you for your
patience during this transition.
|
|
Our Question of the Quarter... |
|
|
|
Rising payments on adjustable rate mortgages
and
slowing real estates markets have caused
foreclosures to spike. By what percentage did they
increase in August 2006 as compared to August 2005?
a. 24%
b. 53%
c. 62%
d. Nominal Change
According to RealtyTrac, an online marketplace
for
foreclosure sales, in August 115,292 properties
entered into foreclosure. That was 24% ahead of
July and 53% ahead of a year ago. So if you
answered B, you were correct.
For those of
you that
think this is a great buying opportunity, where do
you go to look for these foreclosure? Start with the
state of Florida, they had an estimated 16,553
foreclosed properties in August. California was up
160%, with 12,506 for that month and the formally
hot real estate market of Nevada lead the way with
a 255% spike in foreclosures. Why the huge jump in
foreclosures?
The consumer dramatically
underestimated the change an increase of one or two
percentage points could make in a monthly payment.
For example, if John & Sally were paying a monthly
mortgage of $1,600 and their adjustable mortgage
increased to $2,000, the additionally payment of
almost $5,000 a year may have stressed their budget
sufficiently to the point that they needed to sell
their home. The slowing home sales, may have
resulted in no buyers for the property. This could
ultimately force a foreclosure.
The banks and lenders were major contributors to
this problem, lending out to individuals with lower
credit ratings and allowing smaller than traditional
down payments for home purchases.
I see a
continuance in this trend. So for those of you who
are looking for a deal in the foreclosure market
don’t be afraid to sit on the sidelines. There are
sure to be more homes to choose from.
|
|